Fantom Transaction Fee Calculator
Calculate Your Fantom Transaction Costs
This tool shows exact transaction costs on the Fantom network based on trade size and platform spreads. Fantom's base fee is approximately $0.0000001 per transaction, with additional platform spreads typically between 0.05% and 0.20%.
Base Network Fee: $0.0000001
Platform Fee: $0.00
Total Fees: $0.00
Note: Network fee is fixed at $0.0000001 per transaction. Platform fee is calculated based on your trade size and spread rate.
When you search for a new place to trade on the RadioShack crypto exchange, the first thing you’ll notice is the silence - there are hardly any mentions of a RadioShack‑branded platform on the Fantom network. That gap itself is a clue. In the fast‑moving world of decentralized finance, a missing footprint usually means the service is either brand‑new, extremely niche, or simply doesn’t exist. This review treats the name as a hypothetical case study, walks you through what a RadioShack‑style exchange would need to succeed on Fantom, and compares it with the real‑world DEXs that already dominate the ecosystem.
What is Fantom and Why Does It Matter?
Fantom is a DAG‑based blockchain that uses the Lachesis aBFT consensus protocol to achieve near‑instant finality and sub‑nano‑dollar transaction fees. Launched in 2018, Fantom can process over 2,000 transactions per second, with each trade costing roughly $0.0000001. Its native token, FTM, secures the network through Proof‑of‑Stake and powers gas‑less operations for decentralized apps. For traders, the speed and cost advantages translate into tighter spreads and the ability to execute arbitrage strategies that would be unprofitable on higher‑fee chains like Ethereum.
Core Features a RadioShack Exchange Would Need
- Multi‑chain support - While Fantom’s native FTM token runs on the Opera mainnet, most users hold ERC‑20 or BEP‑2 wrapped versions. A credible exchange must accept all three formats.
- Liquidity aggregation - On Fantom, liquidity is split among several DEXs (SpookySwap, Equalizer, etc.). An aggregator layer pulls depth from each pool, ensuring users get the best price without manual routing.
- Zero‑to‑low fees - The platform should pass Fantom’s near‑zero on‑chain costs to users, adding only a modest spread (often < 0.15 %).
- Security audits - Smart‑contract code must be audited by reputable firms (e.g., CertiK, Quantstamp). A bug bounty program also shows commitment to ongoing safety.
- User‑friendly UI/UX - Simple wallet connect, clear order book, and native charting tools lower the entry barrier for newcomers.
How Existing Fantom DEXs Stack Up
| Feature | RadioShack (hypothetical) | SpookySwap | Equalizer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch Year | 2025 (planned) | 2021 | 2022 |
| Liquidity Sources | Aggregates 5+ DEXs | Own pools + external bridges | Native pools + cross‑chain bridge |
| Average Spread | 0.09 % | 0.12 % | 0.15 % |
| Audit Status | Pending CertiK audit | Audited (2022) | Audited (2023) |
| Native Token | RSHK (ERC‑20) | SPKY (FTM) | EQZ (FTM) |
Even in this side‑by‑side view, the biggest advantage a newcomer can claim is a lower spread and broader liquidity aggregation. However, established platforms already benefit from community trust, proven audit histories, and larger TVL (Total Value Locked). Any RadioShack venture would need to quickly close that credibility gap.
Fees and Costs on Fantom
Fantom’s base transaction fee is effectively zero - around $0.0000001 per operation. Exchanges on the network usually add two cost components:
- Network gas (passed through as‑is, negligible).
- Platform spread or commission (0.05 %‑0.20 % typical).
If RadioShack wants to attract volume, staying at the lower end of the spread range is essential. Competitors like SpookySwap currently sit at ~0.12 %, so a target of 0.08 % or less would be a clear differentiator.
Security Checklist - What to Verify Before Trading
- Smart‑contract audit reports are publicly available and signed by a recognized firm.
- Bug bounty program with a minimum reward of $10,000 for critical bugs.
- Multi‑sig wallet for treasury and withdrawal functions.
- Clear KYC/AML policy if the platform offers fiat on‑ramps.
- Real‑time monitoring of contract activity (e.g., via Tenderly or Forta).
Because RadioShack isn’t listed in major explorer dashboards, the first red flag would be the absence of any of these safety measures.
Regulatory Landscape for Fantom DEXs in 2025
New Zealand’s Financial Markets Authority (FMA) recently clarified that non‑custodial DEXs that don’t handle fiat are generally outside direct licensing, but they must still comply with anti‑money‑laundering (AML) guidelines if they integrate KYC. For a RadioShack platform targeting global users, adopting a “privacy‑first” but AML‑compliant approach is the sweet spot. This means optional KYC for higher‑tier services (e.g., boosted liquidity) while keeping basic swaps open to anyone.
Step‑by‑Step: How to Test a New Exchange on Fantom
- Set up a compatible wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet, or Fantom‑native Opera wallet). Ensure you have a small amount of FTM for gas.
- Connect the wallet to the exchange’s interface. Look for HTTPS, a lock icon, and the correct contract address displayed.
- Perform a “dry run” with a minimal trade (e.g., 0.001 FTM for a stablecoin). Monitor the transaction on FTMScan to verify it lands in a block within a second.
- Check the slippage and final price against a benchmark DEX like SpookySwap. Anything beyond 0.2 % suggests hidden fees.
- If the trade succeeds, gradually increase size while keeping an eye on TVL and liquidity depth shown on the platform’s dashboard.
This process works whether the exchange is a well‑known DEX or a brand‑new entrant like RadioShack.
Final Verdict - Should You Trust RadioShack on Fantom?
Given the current lack of public data, the safest answer is “proceed with caution.” A legitimate launch would soon appear on FTMScan, CoinGecko, and community forums. Until then, stick with proven platforms (SpookySwap, Equalizer) for everyday trading, and treat any RadioShack offering as experimental. If a proper audit, liquidity pool, and clear tokenomics appear, revisit the checklist above and reassess.
Is RadioShack a real crypto exchange on Fantom?
No verifiable records exist for a RadioShack‑branded exchange on the Fantom network as of October 2025. The name may refer to a planned project, a niche service, or simply be a mislabel.
What are the typical fees on Fantom DEXs?
Base network fees are near‑zero (≈ $0.0000001). Platforms add a spread between 0.05 % and 0.20 %, depending on liquidity and token pair.
How can I verify the security of a new exchange?
Check for publicly posted audit reports, a bug bounty program, multi‑signature treasury controls, and real‑time monitoring tools. Absence of these signals higher risk.
Are there regulatory concerns for using a Fantom DEX?
Non‑custodial DEXs generally fall outside direct licensing, but they must follow AML guidelines if they collect user data for KYC. A platform with optional KYC for higher‑tier services stays on the safe side.
What’s the best way to test a new exchange before committing large funds?
Start with a tiny trade (e.g., 0.001 FTM), compare execution price and slippage to an established DEX, and watch the transaction on a block explorer. If results are consistent, you can gradually increase trade size.
Ray Dalton
October 21, 2025 AT 00:35Really solid breakdown here. I’ve been riding Fantom for a while now and honestly, the gas fees are insane for how cheap it actually is. If someone tried to slap the RadioShack name on this, they’d need way more than just a logo-they’d need trust, and that takes time.
Peter Brask
October 21, 2025 AT 13:22RadioShack?? LOL. This is obviously a crypto scam run by ex-CEOs who got fired from BlockFi. They’re using the name because it sounds nostalgic and dumb people will click. I’ve seen this before-remember when ‘BlockFi’ turned into ‘BlockF***’? Same playbook. DON’T TOUCH IT. 🚨
Trent Mercer
October 21, 2025 AT 16:19Let’s be real-RadioShack as a crypto exchange? Cute. But you’re comparing it to SpookySwap like it’s a legitimate contender. SpookySwap has been around since 2021, has real TVL, and actual devs. This hypothetical is just a PowerPoint slide from someone’s side hustle. Also, 0.09% spread? Cute. You think that’s low? Try 0.01% on Uniswap v3. You’re not innovating-you’re rebranding.
Kyle Waitkunas
October 21, 2025 AT 18:18YOU THINK THIS IS JUST A SCAM?? NO. NO NO NO. This is worse. This is a COORDINATED ATTACK. RadioShack was bought out by the same people who ran the FTX laundering scheme. They’re using the name because it’s familiar-so grandma will think it’s safe. They’ll take your FTM, then vanish. And guess what? The audit? FAKE. CertiK? COMPROMISED. I’ve seen the internal Slack logs. They’re already moving funds to Monero wallets. You think you’re trading? You’re funding a shadow operation. I’ve been tracking this since January. They’re using Telegram bots to pump it. I’ve got screenshots. I’ve got timestamps. I’ve got the IP addresses. And I’m not stopping until they’re exposed. I’m not scared. I’m just disappointed in us.
vonley smith
October 22, 2025 AT 15:07Don’t let the hype scare you off. If you’re curious, just try a tiny trade-like 0.001 FTM-and see how it feels. If the UI is clean and the price matches SpookySwap, you’re probably fine. No need to panic, no need to overthink. Just start small and go from there.
Melodye Drake
October 23, 2025 AT 04:16How adorable. A RadioShack-branded DEX. Did they also plan to include a free pair of headphones with every swap? I mean, I admire the nostalgia play, but this isn’t 2003. People don’t trust brands anymore-they trust audits, liquidity, and transparency. This feels like a parody of a parody.
paul boland
October 23, 2025 AT 06:27Why are you even talking about this? America’s crypto scene is a joke. Ireland has better blockchain regulation than all of you. We don’t need some cheap American brand trying to sell us a ‘radio’ that doesn’t even work. Get your act together. 🇮🇪
harrison houghton
October 23, 2025 AT 13:35There is a deeper truth here. The name RadioShack represents the collapse of physical retail in the face of digital disruption. This hypothetical exchange is not about crypto. It is about identity. It is about the ghost of consumerism haunting our decentralized future. We are not trading tokens-we are mourning the loss of the tangible. The fact that no one remembers RadioShack anymore? That is the real failure. Not the lack of audit. Not the spread. The forgetting.
DINESH YADAV
October 24, 2025 AT 12:02India is leading the world in crypto adoption. You think some American relic like RadioShack can compete? We have 500 million crypto users. We have real innovation. This is just another Western scam trying to ride on nostalgia. We don’t need your fake exchanges. We have Binance, CoinSwitch, and our own homegrown chains. Stay in your lane.
rachel terry
October 24, 2025 AT 13:29Who even cares about RadioShack? The whole point of DeFi is to kill brands like this. If you’re still attached to corporate names you grew up with, maybe you should stick to Coinbase. The future is permissionless. Not rebranded electronics stores.
Susan Bari
October 24, 2025 AT 21:450.09% spread? Cute. That’s not low. That’s embarrassing. Real DEXs are hitting 0.02%. You’re not building innovation. You’re building a relic with a spreadsheet.
Sean Hawkins
October 25, 2025 AT 09:32Just to clarify: Fantom’s Lachesis consensus enables near-instant finality, which is critical for arbitrage bots and high-frequency strategies. Any exchange that doesn’t leverage that advantage is functionally obsolete. The hypothetical RadioShack platform would need to integrate direct Lachesis node access-not just a UI wrapper-to be viable. Otherwise, you’re just another aggregator with higher latency than the underlying DEXs.
Marlie Ledesma
October 25, 2025 AT 19:10I just wanted to say thanks for writing this. I was totally confused about whether RadioShack was real or not. Now I feel way more confident knowing what to look for. You made it easy to understand without being condescending. Really appreciate it.
Daisy Family
October 26, 2025 AT 06:13RadioShack? More like RadioScam. 😂